Within users when you look at the an internet dating matchmaking, very was in fact college students (77
Postado em 26.06.2022
89 (SD = dos.27); 4.94 (SD = 2.97), each other communities varying between 6 months and you may eleven several years of relationship; eight.76 (SD = 4.01), ranging from a couple of and 19 ages; and you will (SD = cuatro.82), anywhere between below per year and 29 years. 8%) and you may resided that have relatives, when you’re those people coping with their couples was in fact generally doing work individuals (69.2%), at which 53% got university otherwise postgraduate grade. Of one’s certified connection professionals, 67% had college or university otherwise post-scholar amounts, from which 89.8% have been working, 2% resigned and 8.2% underemployed. The functional disease toward married players was similar: 89.5% have been operating, 2.9% was basically retired and 6.3% was unemployed, and you will step 1.3% called various other a career position. Within classification, 62.5% of your own players got college or university otherwise postgraduate amounts.
Relationships Quality, selected to confirm standards validity, is measured to your Relationship Score Means–Changed (RRF-R; dabble promo code Davis, 1996, adjust
The content shown is actually accumulated within the framework from greater search programs, hence consisted of an in depth sociodemographic and you can relationships analysis, along with other balances when you look at the extent from close matchmaking.
Private union try examined according to Portuguese type (Table step one) of quicker sort of the Work Level (Stanley, 1986), that was interpreted depending on the after the interpretation and you can retroversion actions: after consent got of the publisher, the original scale was translated by several experts in the field, both of these translations have been subjected to retroversion by the a few pros, you to bilingual and another experienced in the usage the new English language; finally, for every version is than the amazing size, opting for the application of this new terms and conditions and you may activities which have greater distance so you can they. The new Portuguese type therefore contains brand new fourteen modern facts and an equivalent respond to level and you may is entitled, just after deliberation by people, the personal Commitment Level (‘Escala de- Compromisso Pessoal’–ECP). For the latest phase of your own translation processes, this new means is actually given to three users on aim of verifying brand new adequateness of one’s vocabulary as well as the unambiguous knowledge of things, which were talked about to your players shortly after applying of the latest survey. Because there was no comments claiming otherwise, things remained an identical.
With respect to the complete time of the relationship, the common, in years, towards the various other statuses described try, respectively: 2
by Lind, 2008). Resulting from a revision of the original Davis (1996, cited in Lind, 2008) scale, this instrument is intended to measure relationship quality perception, with the expectation that, according to the theoretical assumptions, both scales will positively correlate. The items are presented in the form of questions that the subjects will answer according to a rating scale of 1 (not at all) to 9 (completely or extremely). The Portuguese version consists of a total of 46 items grouped in four dimensions: Passion, Confidence, Conflict and Intimacy. The RRF-R revealed psychometric properties ranging from good to excellent, obtaining an excellent internal consistency at the total scale level, with Cronbach’s alpha values between .97 and .98, for women and men respectively, and .81 and .97 at subscale level, a good temporal stability (significant correlations ranging between .70 and .87; p < .01) and high concurrent validity with a marital satisfaction scale (significant global score correlations between .88 and .85, for women and men respectively; p < .01). In the current sample, the RRF-R presented for the total scale, an excellent Cronbach's alpha of .96; .94 for the Passion subscale, .93 for Confidence, .77 for Conflict and .83 for Intimacy. The internal consistency of the total scale remained excellent for the four subsamples: .95 for participants in a dating relationship, .94 for those in a dating relationship with cohabitation and .97 for participants in both formal unions and married relationships.